Author(s): Esme Shirlow
This chapter analyses how mediation interacts with investment treaty arbitration, and explores the benefits and risks associated with this form of dispute settlement. It begins by introducing mediation as a non-arbitral means of settling investor-state disputes at the international level, examining uses of investor-state mediation, and references to its use, under investment treaties to date. The chapter then considers the relative strengths of mediation vis-à-vis arbitration. This includes the potential for the mediation of investment disputes to produce a quicker, more cost-effective, flexible, and holistic dispute settlement procedure with different outcomes than are available through investor-state arbitration.
The chapter also looks at three key disadvantages potentially associated with investor-state mediation: issues of confidentiality, issues of authority, and issues of enforcement. It argues that these disadvantages may weaken the efficacy and legitimacy of mediation as a dispute settlement option for investor-state disputes, while also undermining the improvements to investor-state arbitration procedures secured through recent reform efforts. Finally, the chapter looks at how mediation could be leveraged alongside arbitration to improve both procedures for the settlement of investment disputes.
Research theme: Private Law