Supervision,
Examination and Marking of Graduate Research Units
THE
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
FACULTY
OF LAW
GRADUATE
STUDIES IN LAW
SUPERVISION,
EXAMINATION AND MARKING OF
GRADUATE RESEARCH UNITS
Effective from 1 January 2006
The following
general guidelines apply to the Graduate Research Unit
(12 credit points) undertaken for the Master degree
courses from 2001
Eligibility
1.
Students require a Distinction average (70%) in a minimum
of 24 units of courses taken in the Graduate Program
in Law. (or at the discretion of the Director, Postgraduate
Coursework Program with the support of the potential
supervisor in special circumstances); and
2. Topic and agreed potential supervisor have been identified
and approved by the program/specialisation convenor
and/or Director, Postgraduate Coursework Program.
Supervision
of Graduate Research Units
1.
The student should arrange a time to meet with the relevant
program/specialisation convenor to discuss possible
topics for papers and supervision arrangements.
2.
After the initial discussion with the relevant convenor,
the student should prepare and submit a brief outline
of the proposed research topic to the convenor. The
outline should comprise the proposed research topic
and the key issues to be addressed. It should also identify
primary and secondary sources and the methods to be
employed. The student may discuss the proposed research
topic with any Faculty member.
3.
After consideration of the outline and, if necessary,
further discussion between the relevant convenor and
the student, the Director, in consultation with the
relevant convenor, will appoint a supervisor.
4.
A student may reasonably expect that the supervisor
will
5.
The supervisor and student should be provided with a
copy of these guidelines and any other relevant information
on graduate supervision at the ANU.
Citation
The Faculty recommends students use Australian Guide
To Legal Citation available in the Law Library or on
the web at http://mulr.law.unimelb.edu.au/PDFs/aglc_dl.pdf
Word
Limit
1.
The Graduate Research Unit requires a paper of between
12,000 and 16,000 words in length.
2.
The word count for a paper will be the count carried
out by Microsoft Word, and will include footnotes and
all other material, other than a bibliography or appendices
which merely reproduce primary materials for the aid
of the examiners.
3.
If an extension to the word limit is sought, a student
must submit a written application to her/his supervisor.
The relevant convenor shall decide on whether an extension
to the word limit is to be granted.
Submission
Date
1.
Graduate Research Unit papers must be submitted by the
due date which is as follows:
(a) 15 June for semester one enrolment;
(b) 15 November for semester two enrolment;
(c) 1 March for summer session enrolment.
Where the due date falls on a weekend or a public or
University holiday the due date will be the next working
day
Students should advise the Faculty Office in writing
when submitting their paper if a result is required
to enable graduation at the next ceremony.
2.
A student may only be granted an extension of time upon
application to the relevant convenor or the Director,
who will consult with the student's supervisor. Extensions
will be granted only on the grounds that the student
has suffered a serious interruption in the preparation
of the paper for medical or other good reasons, or that
there are circumstances which would, in the case of
assessment by examination, justify the granting of a
special examination. Late submission not covered by
an approved extension will attract a mark penalty.
3.
The paper should be submitted in hard copy to the Postgraduate
Administrator, Students, Faculty Office using the cover
sheet and including the word count.
Appointment
of Examiners
1.
Two examiners for each Graduate Research Unit paper
will be appointed by the Director in consultation with
the relevant Convenor.
2.
One of the examiners so appointed will usually be the
supervisor of the paper. The other examiner will, whenever
possible, be a member of the staff of the Faculty. Where
no member of the staff other than the supervisor is
competent to examine the paper, an outside examiner
will be appointed. If possible, this will be a member
of staff of the University. The need to appoint a suitable
examiner should be borne in mind by members of the Faculty
when approving topics.
3.
Students are entitled to know the names of their examiners.
Examination
of Graduate Research Unit Papers
1.
Both examiners should regard themselves as first examiners
of a Graduate Research Unit paper and should, therefore,
read the paper independently before consulting on the
mark that is to be recommended.
2.
The examiner of the Graduate Research Unit paper who
has not been the supervisor should prepare a report,
commenting on the strengths and weaknesses of the paper
and recommending a mark. The other examiner may indicate
agreement with that report and mark, or prepare a separate
report recommending the same or a different mark.
3.
It is suggested that examiners should comment on the
following matters, in addition to any other comments
they may wish to make:
a. the degree of originality, depth of research, whether
the paper makes a useful contribution to legal knowledge;
b. the quality of arguments or reasoning;
c. the organisation of the paper;
d. the use of authorities, including some indication
of their accuracy; and
e. literary style.
4.
The marks for the Graduate Research Unit papers are
graded on the normal scale of High Distinction, Distinction,
Credit, Pass, Fail.
5.
After the results of Graduate Research Unit papers have
been published, students will be notified of the final
mark awarded by the Faculty, and they will also be entitled,
on request, to know the marks suggested by the examiners
and to have copies of their examiners' reports.
6.
For the purposes of the Examinations (The Faculties)
Rules, the Chairperson of Examiners for the unit will
be the relevant Convenor. These Rules provide that it
is the duty of the Chairperson of Examiners in a unit
to ensure that the academic performance of each student
in that unit has been adequately and fairly assessed.
SJH
8 August 2005